Meta Creates Nonvoting Stock For Zuckerberg
A new share class allows the Meta chief to sell equity for California's proposed wealth tax without surrendering his voting majority.
By Mei Ling ·

Meta has introduced a new class of nonvoting stock to address a looming financial obligation for its chief executive.
During the company's earnings call on Wednesday, leadership confirmed that the board approved Class C common stock, which takes effect in January. These shares grant holders an ownership stake in the company but strip them of any voting power on corporate decisions. Meta stated that this instrument will serve multiple purposes, including capital raising, employee compensation, and funding acquisitions. The structure is designed to preserve the current voting dynamics that currently favor founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who retains approximately 60% of the total voting control.
While the company cited standard corporate reasons for the issuance, a report by The New York Times suggests a more specific personal motivation. The new nonvoting shares are intended to help Zuckerberg manage the financial impact of California's proposed "billionaire tax." By selling these specific shares, the CEO could generate the necessary cash to cover the tax liability without diluting his voting influence over the company's direction.
The tax in question is Proposition 40, a measure drafted by Berkeley tax law professors and sponsored by California's largest healthcare union, SEIU United Healthcare Workers West. If approved by voters, the proposal would impose a one-time 5% wealth tax on the net worth of hundreds of California-based billionaires. Proponents estimate the measure could raise up to $100 billion over five years, with the majority of funds allocated to state healthcare needs and the remainder directed toward food assistance and education.
According to the Times, Zuckerberg actively pushed the board to develop a protective strategy. In September, he reportedly told board members that if a consensus was not reached, he would list his Palo Alto property for sale, a move that could have triggered significant media attention. The stock plan emerged shortly after these discussions.
The strategy is detailed in a recent SEC filing by Meta, which documents that Zuckerberg began discussing the billionaire tax with board members as early as July. The topic remained a focus of meetings and communications throughout July and August. The filing explains the mechanics of the new share class: existing shareholders will receive one Class C share for every Class A or Class B share they hold. This one-time stock dividend is structured as a two-for-one split, which the company notes will not alter the voting power of any shareholder.
The filing explicitly links the dividend to the tax liability. It states that the dividend will allow Zuckerberg to immediately sell or transfer up to 20% of his received Class C shares. Because the dividend is one-for-one, this cap represents 10% of his overall economic stake in the company. The document notes this can be done "for any reason, including so that he may pay his potential tax liability under California Proposition 40, if enacted into law, without affecting his majority voting control." Estimates suggest Zuckerberg could owe as much as $11 billion under the tax.
Meta responded to inquiries by pointing to a quote in its earnings press release. The company's Special Committee affirmed that it was important for Zuckerberg to continue leading the company from California, emphasizing the need for him to remain in close coordination with management and Meta Superintelligence Labs.
Proposition 40 has stirred significant reaction among Silicon Valley leaders. Google co-founder Sergey Brin has campaigned aggressively against the measure, spending substantial funds to defeat it. Other critics have described the tax as economic suicide for the state, warning it could drive capital flight. However, Meta's new structure suggests a pragmatic approach to compliance. Democratic U.S. Representative Ro Khanna, a vocal supporter of the tax, commented on X that billionaires appear ready to stay and pay, adding that passing the measure would ensure healthcare for poor California kids.
Source: TechCrunch


